{{ siteName }} Trials / Utah / Utah v. Robinson / Filings / Cameras ruling Following ★
FILING · COURT ORDER
Order: cameras permitted at the preliminary hearing
Issued by the court July 1, 2026 Granted over objection
IN BRIEF Judge Graf granted a coalition of news organizations' request to photograph and broadcast the preliminary hearing, over a defense objection that live coverage could taint witnesses and the eventual jury pool. The order sets conditions on where cameras may point.
WHAT THE ORDER SAYS

The court granted media access under Utah's rules on electronic coverage of court proceedings, finding the public interest in a high-profile capital case weighed in favor of allowing cameras. The ruling treats the preliminary hearing as a public proceeding to which the presumption of openness applies.

The defense had objected that broadcasting testimony before trial risks witness intimidation and could contaminate the jury pool in a death-penalty case drawing national attention. Judge Graf acknowledged those concerns but concluded they could be managed with conditions rather than a blanket ban.

The order imposes limits: cameras may not show jurors should the case reach that stage, must not capture bench conferences or privileged communications, and are subject to the court's discretion to suspend coverage of any witness who demonstrates a specific, credible safety concern.

CONDITIONS SET
One pool camera in the courtroom
SHARED FEED
ALLOWED
Bench conferences & sidebars
PRIVILEGED
NO AUDIO
Witnesses with safety concerns
CASE BY CASE
MAY OPT OUT
Future jurors, if bound over
IDENTITY PROTECTION
NEVER SHOWN
WHY IT MATTERS

The ruling is why the preliminary hearing has played out on live television, and it framed a later flashpoint: whether Robinson's recorded confession and his roommate's interview could be shown publicly. Erika Kirk pushed for that transparency, and the court ultimately allowed the recordings over defense objection.

FILING DETAILS
TypeCourt order
Issued byHon. Tony Graf Jr.
DatedJuly 1, 2026
Court4th District — Provo
StatusGranted over objection
Download order ↓
order PDF, page 1
3 pages · signed order
← Back to the case